|
The Daily Telegraph’s Charles Moore hopes hope Mr Cameron will think more deeply about how the Christian heritage he holds dear is under attack. Until quite recently, Christians in Britain could assume the goodwill, if not the active belief, of the powerful in society. That assumption can no longer be made. Our beliefs are under attack from influential and militant atheists on the one hand and Muslim extremists on the other. To defend them, we have to work out much more carefully what they actually are.
The Independent’s Grace Dent thinks Cameron’s party policy on feeding people and his belief in the teachings of Jesus are utterly at odds. Perhaps the PM should volunteer for a week at a food bank, feeding the poor in a Christian manner, to shed some light on the dilemma? As an agnostic, she almost prays for a Second Coming of Christ, just to see Cameron have to face him and squirm.
The Daily Mail’s Stephen Glover asks: How can men of science solemnly declare that Christians are now in a minority in this country when by far the most authoritative recent survey indicates that they remain, by a significant margin, in the majority? The only explanation he can think of is that some at least of the signatories are zealots who, despite their scientific training, can be far more emotional and extreme in their thinking than the religious believers whom they hold in contempt.
In The Times Francis Elliott argues that Lynton Crosby will argue that it is possible to have Gospel Dave and Retail George. But which should you put on the campaigning leaflet cover?
In The Daily Express Ross Clark says we can argue about the extent of the continuing influence of Christianity in modern life and to what extent to which Britain is still a religious country. But atheists might be a little more convincing if they were prepared to write their own letters to a paper. As a contribution to the debate on religion and national life David Cameron’s article was considerably more interesting than the round robin it inspired.
|